Can One AEC Website Work for Both Clients and Job Candidates?

AEC
7 min
Published on
September 25, 2026

Yes, but not by giving both audiences equal space on every page. Clients should own the homepage and the main navigation. Candidates should get a dedicated path of their own. And the pages in between, projects, team, and approach, should be written so they work for both. Most firms get into trouble when they try to split the difference everywhere and end up speaking clearly to neither group.

‍

Why This Question Matters More Than It Used To

For a lot of AEC firms, hiring has become as hard as winning work. Strong project managers, engineers, and designers have options, and they research firms the same way clients do. They read the website before they apply, and many of them decide whether to apply based on what they find.

That means the website is doing recruiting work whether the firm planned for it or not. The question is whether it is doing that work well.

‍

Where the Two Audiences Overlap

Clients and candidates care about more of the same things than most firms expect. Both want to see the quality and type of work the firm does. Both want a sense of who the people are. Both are trying to figure out what it would actually be like to work with this firm, whether as a client or as a colleague.

That overlap is good news. Strong project pages, a real team section, and an honest description of how the firm approaches its work already do most of the recruiting job. A candidate reading a detailed case study about a difficult hospital renovation learns what kind of work they would be doing and how the firm thinks through hard problems. That is more persuasive than any line in a job posting.

‍

Where They Split

The two audiences start to separate on what they need to know next. Clients want to understand capability, fit, process, and what happens after they reach out. Candidates want to understand what their role would look like, who they would learn from, how people grow at the firm, and how the firm treats the people who work there.

Trying to answer both sets of questions on the homepage makes the homepage worse for everyone.

‍

Do Not Split the Homepage

A common instinct is to put two big buttons at the top of the homepage, one for hiring the firm and one for joining it. It feels fair to both audiences. In practice, it weakens the page's main job.

The homepage should speak to clients first, because that is where the business comes from. Candidates will still find their way to careers content through the navigation, and many of them will read the client-facing pages anyway as part of their research. A clear link to careers in the main navigation is enough.

‍

Build a Real Careers Page

Most AEC careers pages are a paragraph about culture and an embedded job board. That treats the most important recruiting page on the site as an afterthought.

A useful careers page answers the questions a strong candidate is actually asking. What kind of projects would I be working on. Who would I work with day to day. How does someone grow from a junior role to leading projects here. What does mentorship look like in practice. What does the hiring process involve and how long does it take.

Real examples carry weight here. A short profile of someone who started as an intern and now runs projects says more about growth at the firm than a sentence about career development.

‍

Let the Team Page Do Double Duty

The team page is one of the few places that serves both audiences equally well. Clients want to know who will be working on their project. Candidates want to know who they would be learning from.

Bios that describe what someone actually does, the kind of work they lead, and how they approach it are useful to both. Bios that list degrees and licenses and stop there help neither.

‍

Watch the Culture Language

Generic culture claims have the same problem generic client-facing claims do. "We are like a family," "we value work-life balance," and "we invest in our people" appear on almost every AEC careers page, which means none of them tell a candidate anything.

Specifics do the work instead. How many people were promoted into project leadership last year. What the firm does to support licensure. What a typical week looks like for someone in a given role. If you cannot find something specific to say, that is worth paying attention to, and not just for the website.

‍

A Simple Test

Ask someone who joined your firm in the last year to read your careers page and tell you whether it describes the place they actually work. If the answer is no, or if they had to piece that picture together from other pages, the page needs work.

‍

See how Fairbuilt approaches AEC websites

Start a conversation

Have any questions?